Efecto de concretud inverso en Afasia Progresiva Primaria-variante semántica: Estudio longitudinal de un paciente / Inverse Concrete Effect in Primary Progressive Aphasia-Semantic Variant: Longitudinal Study of a Patient

La Afasia Progresiva Primaria (APP) es una patología neurodegenerativa que se presenta con afectación insidiosa y progresiva del lenguaje. Los criterios diagnósticos actuales diferencian tres subtipos de APP, cada una con perfiles neurolingüísticos específicos. Diversas investigaciones han propuesto que un síntoma característico de la APP variante semántica (APP-vs) es un mayor compromiso en el procesamiento de conceptos concretos que de abstractos (Efecto de Concretud Inverso - ECI). Para explicar este ECI se han propuesto diferentes explicaciones: (a). el patrón de compromiso neural, (b). el nivel educativo de los pacientes, (c). el estadio de la enfermedad. El objetivo del presente trabajo es estudiar en forma longitudinal la progresión en el procesamiento de conceptos concretos y abstractos en un paciente diagnosticado con APP-vs. Para ello se utilizó una tarea de juicios de sinonimia donde se debe identificar si dos palabras son sinónimos o no. La tarea cuenta con pares de conceptos concretos y abstractos. Se evaluó al paciente en tres momentos (2014, 2015 y 2016). Se observó un mejor desempeño de conceptos abstractos en la primera evaluación. El ECI desaparece en la segunda evaluación. El patrón se revierte en la tercera. Estos resultados apoyan la propuesta de que el ECI observado en pacientes con APP-vs es un síntoma de los estadios iniciales de la enfermedad. Este ECI se relacionaría con la afectación temprana de las porciones del Lóbulo Temporal Anterior que procesan rasgos visuales, que serían más relevantes para los conceptos concretos.

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease which appears with progressive and insidious affectation of language. Current diagnostic criteria establish three different subtypes of PPA, each showing specific neurolinguistic profiles. Several researches have proposed a Reverse Concreteness Effect (RCE) as a main symptom for the Semantic Variant of PPA (sv-PPA), that is, a better performance with abstract than concrete concepts. Different explanations for this effect include: (a). pattern of neural degeneration, (b). patients' educational level, (c). moment of disease progression. The aim of this work is to study the progression of concrete and abstract concepts processing in a patient diagnosed with sv-PPA. We used a synonyms judgement task where the subject has to indicate if two words are synonyms or not. The task include both concrete and abstract concepts. The patient was evaluated in three different moments (2014, 2015 and 2016). A better performance with abstract concepts was observed during the first evaluation. The RCE disappeared during the second assessment. The third time showed a reversed pattern. Our results support those proposing that the RCE can only be found at initial stages of vs-PPA. The RCE appears to be related to the early degeneration of some portions in the Anterior Temporal Lobe which process visual features. These would be much more relevant for processing concrete concepts.

Demencia semántica y demencia tipo Alzheimer ¿Igual rendimiento en tareas semánticas? / Semantic dementia and Alzheimer´s disease: similar performance in semantic tasks?

Introducción: La Demencia Semántica (DS) y la Demencia de tipo Alzheimer (DTA) presentan deterioro semántico; sin embargo, existen pocos estudios comparativos que investiguen las características de éstos déficits en estas patologías. Objetivos: Comparar perfiles de desempeño en tareas semánticas en pacientes con DS y con DTA. Metodología: Se evaluaron 24 pacientes diagnosticados con DS (N=11) o DTA (N= 13) mediante tareas de denominación de dibujos, asociaciones semánticas y fluidez semántica. Resultados: Se hallaron diferencias significativas de rendimiento en las tres tareas semánticas respecto de los controles en ambos grupos de pacientes. Conclusiones: La DS y DTA poseen perfiles de deterioro semántico diferente. El grupo de pacientes con DS presentó mayor compromiso de la memoria semántica especialmente en la tarea de asociaciones semánticas.

Introduction: Semantic Dementia (SD) and Dementia of the Alzheimer´s type (DAT) have deficits in semantic memory. However there are few comparative studies to determine their characteristic semantic impairments. Objectives: Compare performance of semantic tasks in patients with SD and DAT. Methodology: We evaluated 24 patients diagnosed with SD (N = 11) and DAT (N =13). We administered semantic tasks of picture naming, semantic associations and semantic fluency. Results: Significant differences in performance in the three semantic tasks compared to controls in both patient groups were found. Conclusions: SD and DAT profiles have different semantic impairment. The group of patients with SD had higher commitment of semantic memory especially in the task of semantic associations.

¿Pirámides y palmeras o pirámides y faraones?: Adaptación y validación de un test de asociación semántica al español rioplatense / Pyramids and palm trees or pyramids and pharaohs?: Adaptation and valifation of semantic association test to the spanish

La memoria semántica es definida como el sistema que permite almacenar el significado de las palabras, objetos, conceptos y el significado del mundo en general. El test más utilizado para evaluar los déficit semánticos adquiridos es el Test de Pirámides y Palmeras (Howard & Patterson, 1992). Es una prueba de asociación semántica que se administra desde diferentes modalidades (pictórica y verbal) y se encuentra muy condicionada por el medio sociocultural. Los objetivos de este trabajo son: presentar la adaptación y validación del Test de Pirámides y Palmeras al español rioplatense, comparar una versión original del test con una nueva versión abreviada y modificada, denominada Test de Pirámides y Faraones, comparar el rendimiento entre sujetos normales y pacientes y obtener puntajes de corte para el diagnóstico de dificultades semánticas en ambas versiones. El test se administró en forma computarizada a 50 voluntarios (40 controles y 10 pacientes con demencia semántica). De las 66 tríadas adaptadas y construidas se seleccionaron las 20 que mejor discriminaron entre pacientes y controles. La fiabilidad del test original fue de alpha igual a .857 para la modalidad pictórica y alpha igual a .910 para la modalidad verbal. La del nuevo test fue de alpha igual a .917 para la modalidad pictórica y alpha igual a .918 para la modalidad verbal. Se obtuvo así la adaptación y validación del Test de Pirámides y Palmeras, como así también una versión abreviada, el Test de Pirámides y Faraones, que evalúa adecuadamente la memoria semántica en nuestro medio sociolingüístico y se adecua a los requerimientos clínicos actuales.

Semantic memory is a long term memory system proposed by Tulving (2000) that stores objects, words, and general world knowledge's meanings without connection with any particular time or place. Conceptual knowledge is mostly shared across individuals in a given culture, although its precise scope depends on the individual's experience (Hodges & Patterson,1997; Patterson & Hodges, 1995). Semantic memory may be impaired in many neurological disorders. This disruption may be attributed to pathology in the infer-lateral temporal lobes. Patients with semantic dementia have difficulties with objects and words meanings (Budson & Price, 2005). Pyramids and Palm Trees Test is one of the most used measures to assess acquired semantic impairments (Howard & Patterson, 1992). It's a semantic association test and has six different administration modalities: pictorial, verbal, and combined. This test contains 52 triads. The English normative data from the original Pyramids and Palm Trees Test Manual (Howard & Patterson, 1992) was only obtained in13 young adults, and no participant made morethan three errors. This is a socio-cultural influenced test. The aims of this article are to present the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test adaptation and validation to our language (Spanish) and cultural context, to compare the 52 triads from the original version with a new and shorter 20 triads version, to assess differences in performance between controls and patients in both tests, and to get cutoff scores on both versions. A computerized version of the original test (52 triads) plus 14 new triads (66 triads in total) were administered to 50 volunteers (40 controls and 10 semantic dementia patients). Presentation program was used to present the stimulus. Non frequent cultural associations were omitted: (a) windmill, tulip-daffodil, (b) carrot, lamb-donkey, (c) acorns, donkey-pig, and (d) Eskimo-rowing, boat-kayak. Also, others triads were slightly modified: (a) caterpillar, butterfly-dragonfly by caterpillar, butterfly-ant, (b) Eskimo, igloo-house by Indian, carp-house, (c) crook, sheep-mice by dog, rabbit-mice, (d) padlock, bicycle-car by pump, bicycle- car, (e) blackboard, table-desk by blackboard, pen-chalk, (f) eggs, hen-swan by flock, hen-duck, and (g) soldier, church-castle by knight, church-castle. Triads with composed words in Spanish were changed: (a) safety pin (alfiler de gancho), girl-baby by pacifier, girl-baby, (b) safe (caja fuerte),necklace-tie by jacket (chaleco), necklace-tie, and (c) bath, owl-woodpecker (pájaro carpintero) by bath, owl-canary. Of the 66 adapted triads, the 20 that allowed better discrimination between patients and controls were selected. The new and shorter version is called Pyramids and Pharaohs, because the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test triad had low specificity and moderate sensitivity in our sample and wasn´t selected. In the adapted Pyramids and Palm Trees Test the reliability index of the pictorial version was moderately high (α = .857), and high for the verbal modality (α = .910). In the Pyramids and Pharaohs Test the reliability index was high for both versions (pictorial: α = .917; verbal: α = .918). The cutoff score for the original version was 44 for the pictorial modality and 43 for the verbal modality. In the Pyramids and Pharaohs Test the cutoff score was 17 for the pictorial modality and 18 for the verbal one. Regarding the specificity, the adapted Pyramids and Palm Trees Test was high (98.8%) same as the new shorter test. In relation to the sensitivity, the original test was moderate (70%), lower than the Pyramids and Pharaohs Test (85%). Results indicate that the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test can be considered an appropriate adaptation to our social culture. Moreover a new test was designed, Pyramids and Pharaohs, with only 20 triads, adequate for semantics acquired impairments assessment, useful for the research on cognitive processes and current clinical requirements.

An instrument to quickly and reliably classify aphasic patients' symptoms in syndromes based on cognitive assessments

The classification of aphasic patients' symptoms into a syndrome is a crucial procedure that favours and simplifies the communication among the clinicians involved in patient treatment and follow-up. Nevertheless, the aphasic population usually presents a very heterogeneous symptomatology; consequently, classical syndromes do not offer a good basis to plan their rehabilitation relying on their specific language impairments. Current rehabilitation strategies frequently require the identification of specific cognitive abilities affected. This is why it is common in clinical practice to assess aphasic patients with a syndromic protocol in order to classify them as well as a cognitive battery to plan their rehabilitation. The aim of the present article is to present a quick and reliable tool (i.e., a syndromic classification sheet) to help clinicians classify their clients' symptomatology in a syndrome by means of only one cognitive neuropsychological assessment. Two groups of speech therapists (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) were asked to classify 5 aphasic patients from a syndromic classification sheet and their assessment protocols. Results indicate an acceptable inter-rater agreement for the experienced group but not for the inexperienced one. In conclusion, the classification sheet turned out to be a useful and reliable tool to classify aphasic patients in a given syndrome and by means of only some subtests from a cognitive assessment battery, provided that clinicians had some years of experience. In addition, this new instrument enables language clinicians to shorten the assessment of their aphasic clients.